Abstract

Monazite is a common accessory phosphate mineral that occurs under a wide range of pressure and temperature conditions in sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous rocks. Monazite contains high amounts of Th and U, rendering single monazite grains suitable for in-situ U-Th/Pb dating using laser ablation inductively-coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS). Two key aspects of monazite dating that are critical for accurate age data with maximum precision are (i) optimized instrumental conditions to minimize analytical scatter and (ii) a well characterized reference material to ensure the accuracy of the obtained aged. Here, we analyzed five monazite reference materials (USGS 44069, 94-222, MAdel, Moacir and Thompson Mine Monazite) for their U-Th/Pb ages using LA-ICP-MS technique and applied a variety of laser spot diameters and repetition rates to find the best operational conditions to achieve accurate age data while maintaining maximum precision. We find that a spot diameter of 10 µm and a repetition rate of 10 Hz yield the most precise ages with a deviation of ±2.0% from their respective high-precision U/Pb literature age data. Ages were reproduced in three different LA-ICP-MS laboratories using these parameters. Each reference material was tested for its suitability as a matrix-matched age reference material. For this, a rotating, iterative approach was adopted in which one reference monazite was used as calibration reference material against all others, which were treated as unknowns. The results reveal that USGS 44069, 94-222, Thompson Mine Monazite and MAdel all agree with their respective calculated ages and ID-TIMS reference ages and thus are suggested as suitable calibration reference materials. Moacir, however, appears slightly older than previously suggested (up to 4%), thus, caution is advised here when using Moacir as reference material for U-Th/Pb LA-ICP-MS dating in the absence of further absolute age calibration.

Highlights

  • Three commonly used and two in-house monazite reference material (RM) were chosen to assess their suitability as RM for U-Th/Pb age dating for LA-ICP-MS analyses

  • After determining suitable operational settings during the first two analytical sessions, the refinement of the ablation time to 15 s and the suitability of each individual RM was assessed in the third analytical session 130115, in which each RM was used as calibration RM by treating the others as unknown

  • To calculate the U-Th/Pb monazite ages, the mean measured ratio of each spot is normalized to a correction factor that is based on the measured ratio of all the analyzed USGS 44069 relative to the preferred ratio calculated for the given TIMS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Monazite [(Ce, La, Nd, Th)PO4 ] is an accessory mineral that can contain large amounts of U (up to wt.% UO2 ), Th (< 1 to 30 wt.% ThO2 , common 4–12 wt.%) and light-rare earth elements (LREE) [1,2,3]. Monazite U-Th/Pb ages can be determined using isotope dilution thermal ionization mass spectrometry (ID-TIMS), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) and laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) technique, with each method having their own advantages and disadvantages [10,11]. ID-TIMS analyses achieve an age resolution of < ±0.1% [12], but require the dissolution of whole grains, resulting in the loss of spatial resolution for a mineral that commonly exhibits strong chemical zonation. The age resolution of all three analytical techniques is lower than for ID-TIMS and ranges between ±0.4% for SIMS, to circa. Three commonly used and two in-house monazite RMs were chosen to assess their suitability as RM for U-Th/Pb age dating for LA-ICP-MS analyses. The assessment was performed by determining an analytical protocol, using a variety of operational settings, which was applied to three different LA-ICP-MS laboratories

Monazite Reference Materials
USGS 44069
Method
Sample Preparataion
Analytical Set-Up and Sequence
Background
Instrumental Data Assessment and Age Calculations
Optimisation of Running Parameters
Correction factor versus spot size relative to 10 μm μ m and and 10
Literature Value
Comparison of 238
Chemical Homogeneity
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.