Abstract
A comparison of 2 extraction solvent systems (acetonitrile-water, 21 + 4 and methanol-water, 1 + 1) and 3 mixing apparatus (high-speed blender, wrist-action shaker, and mechanical stirrer) was carried out for different extraction time periods. Methods were evaluated using uncontaminated corn spiked with pure deoxynivalenol (DON), field-inoculated (Fusarium graminearum) corn, and uncontaminated and naturally infected wheat in swine diets. After sample extraction, aliquots were passed through alumina-charcoal cleanup columns, evaporated to dryness, dissolved in 8% aqueous methanol, and injected onto the liquid chromatograph. Results confirm published reports of recoveries from DON-spiked samples; however, longer extraction times (less than or equal to 120 min) were required for naturally contaminated samples. Use of the high-speed blender resulted in faster extractions, but in our laboratory more samples could be more conveniently extracted simultaneously with the wrist-action shaker or mechanical stirrer. Less carryover (co-extraction) of interfering contaminants was observed when acetonitrile-water was used vs methanol-water. Results emphasize the importance of careful evaluation of extraction procedures with not only spiked samples but also naturally contaminated samples to establish extraction times required for maximum deoxynivalenol recoveries.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.