Assessment of eosinophilic rhinosinusitis cases that required secondary treatment (biologics or reoperation) during long-term postoperative courses

Abstract

ObjectiveEndoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is selected as the primary treatment for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS). Biologics or reoperation are sometimes required as secondary treatment after ESS. The present study examined the long-term postoperative courses of ECRS cases treated according to the current treatment concept, the frequency of secondary treatment, and its predictive factors. MethodsNinety-four patients with ECRS who underwent ESS and received continuous management for 1-5 years were retrospectively investigated. Patient characteristics, long-term changes in endoscopic scores and the results of olfactory function tests, and secondary treatment were evaluated. ResultsFive patients underwent reoperation and 11 received dupilumab during the follow-up period (35.9±19.2 months). Sixteen patients (17%) required secondary treatment due to the deterioration of sinus conditions. These patients were significantly younger, had higher comorbidity rates of allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma, and a higher preoperative CT score than those who did not require secondary treatment. Three months after surgery, CT scores, endoscopic scores (E-scores), and the self-administered odor questionnaire (SAOQ) were significantly worse in patients who required secondary treatment. A multivariate regression analysis identified age, preoperative CT scores, and 3-month E-scores as predictive factors for secondary treatment. Three-month E-scores showed higher sensitivity and specificity, and the odds ratio was 11.3 when the cut-off value was set at 10. ConclusionThe early identification of patients for whom ESS may fail is important and additional treatments need to be provided at the appropriate timing where needed. Patients with the following factors need to be carefully followed up: a young age, high preoperative CT score, and high early postoperative E-score.