Abstract

Earthquake is one of the natural disasters which threaten many lives every year. It is impossible to prevent earthquakes from occurring; however, it is possible to predict the building damage, human and property losses in advance to mitigate the adverse effects of the catastrophe. Seismic vulnerability assessment is a complex uncertain spatial decision making problem due to intrinsic uncertainties such as lack of complete data, vagueness in experts’ comments and uncertainties in the numerical data/relations. It is important to identify and model the incorporated uncertainties of seismic vulnerability assessment in order to obtain realistic predictions. Fuzzy sets theory can model the vagueness in weights of the selected criteria and relationships of the criteria with building damage. Dempster’s combination rule is useful for fusion of information on the vulnerability of the buildings which leads to decreased uncertainty of the results. However, when there is a conflict among information sources, classical Dempster rule of combination is not efficient. This paper analyses the uncertainty sources in a geospatial information system (GIS)-based seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings and then focuses on assessing the efficiency of Dempster rule of combination in the fusion of the information sources for the seismic vulnerability assessment. Tabriz, a historical and earthquake prone city in the north west of Iran was selected as the study area. The results verified that some inconsistencies among information sources exist which are important to be considered while proposing a method for the fusion of the information in order to obtain vulnerability assessments with less uncertainty. Based on the assessed building damage, the number of probable victims was estimated. The produced physical and social seismic vulnerability maps provide the required information for urban planners and administrators to reduce property and human losses through pre-earthquake mitigation and preparedness plans efficiently.

Highlights

  • Earthquake is one of the natural disasters that causes severe physical, social and financial damages around the world every year

  • The paper aims to study the role of inconsistency in the PSVA model using fuzzy sets and D-S theory

  • The Dempster rule of combination assumes equivalent importance for evidences while Shafer discounting rule is suggested to be used for enhancing Dempster combination rule when evidences highly conflict

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Earthquake is one of the natural disasters that causes severe physical, social and financial damages around the world every year. Seismic vulnerability assessment is used to determine the likely effects of the hazards on human beings and property within a particular area [1]. If the catastrophic effects of earthquakes are calculated in advance, the human and property losses can be reduced through suitable and timely planning in mitigation and preparedness stage. It is crucial to consider the incorporated uncertainties in seismic vulnerability assessment to obtain realistic information and efficiently reduce potential future losses [2]. This research firstly studies the knowledge-based uncertainties associated with a geographic information system (GIS)-based model for assessing building damage ( called physical seismic vulnerability assessment (PSVA)) emphasizing on the involved inconsistency. After modelling buildings seismic vulnerability emphasizing on considering and subsuming the incorporated epistemic uncertainties, the population loss, that is, human beings exposed to be killed or injured, considering the assessed building damage are estimated

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.