Abstract
BackgroundAssessing adherence to Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) is challenging and might account for the negative findings and generalisability of the major trials to a real-life setting. This study was aimed (1) to extract key components of pediatric EGDT guidelines potentially becoming adherence criteria; (2) to classify adherence criteria into complete, clinically important, and feasible; and (3) to compare percent adherence to selected guidelines using the three approaches.MethodsThis study started with review of existing evidence to extract key components of pediatric EGDT guidelines. Modified Delphi method was then conducted in two rounds among national experts to identify feasible and/or clinically important criteria. Data from the national prospective multicenter study “Clinical Effectiveness of the Utilization of Bundled Care for Severe Sepsis and Septicemia Children” at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) during 1 June 2012 and 28 February 2014 was used to compare percentage of adherence across the three approaches.ResultsOf 28 components extracted from the review, 10 were identified by the national experts through the Modified Delphi as feasible whereas 8 were identified as clinically important. Thirty-one severe sepsis patients (48.39% male, median age 3.4 years) were reviewed. Sepsis mortality was 9.7%, a significant reduction from 19% and 42% in 2010 and 2007, respectively. Based on the complete adherence criteria, the percent adherence varied from 60.71% to 89.29% (overall mean 76.84%), with lower adherence in the dead than the survived cases (73.81% vs 77.17%; p = 0.55). The percent adherence varied by criteria used: 69.35%, 76.84%, and 84.52% for clinical importance, complete, and feasibility criteria, respectively.ConclusionAdherence determination based on selected clinical importance alone might result in an incorrectly estimated clinical benefit of EGDT guidelines, especially in a resource-limited setting. Both clinical importance and feasibility should be integrated into the development of adherence assessment criteria.
Highlights
Severe sepsis and septic shock are associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1, 2]
The percent adherence varied by criteria used: 69.35%, 76.84%, and 84.52% for clinical importance, complete, and feasibility criteria, respectively
Adherence determination based on selected clinical importance alone might result in an incorrectly estimated clinical benefit of Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) guidelines, especially in a resource-limited setting. Both clinical importance and feasibility should be integrated into the development of adherence assessment criteria
Summary
Severe sepsis and septic shock are associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1, 2]. Goal-directed therapy (EGDT)—a strategy for hemodynamic optimization—has been advocated in clinical practice for sepsis management [2,3,4,5,6,7]. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was introduced in 2004 and later updated in 2008 and 2012, covering management of adult and pediatric patients with severe sepsis and septic shock [8, 9]. The guideline has been underused; for instance, only 7% of the emergency physicians routinely implemented adult EGDT, based on a survey of 30 academic tertiary care hospitals in the US [11]. Barriers to guideline implementation included a critical shortage of nursing staff, problems in obtaining central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring, and challenges in early identification of patients with sepsis [12, 13]. This study was aimed (1) to extract key components of pediatric EGDT guidelines potentially becoming adherence criteria; (2) to classify adherence criteria into complete, clinically important, and feasible; and (3) to compare percent adherence to selected guidelines using the three approaches
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
