Abstract

Complications affect treatment outcomes and quality of life in addition to increasing treatment costs. To evaluate complication rates after the treatment of a distal radius fracture, to determine whether the rate or complication type is associated with treatment method, and to determine predictors of complications. The multicenter Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial (WRIST), a randomized clinical trial, enrolled participants from April 10, 2012, to December 31, 2016. The study included 304 adults 60 years or older with isolated unstable distal radius fractures; 187 were randomized and 117 opted for casting. The study was conducted at 24 health systems in the United States, Canada, and Singapore. Data for this secondary analysis were collected from April 24, 2012, to February 28, 2018. Participants opting for surgery were randomized to receive the volar locking plate system (n = 65), percutaneous pinning (n = 58), or bridging external fixation with or without supplemental pinning (n = 64). Patients who chose not to have surgery (n = 117) were not randomized and were enrolled for casting. Complication rate. The WRIST enrolled a total of 304 participants, of whom 8 casting group participants were later found to be ineligible and were excluded from the analysis, leaving 296 participants. Randomized participants' mean (SD) age was 68 (7.2) years, 163 (87%) were female, and 165 (88%) were white. Casting participants' mean (SD) age was 75.6 (9.6) years, 93 (84%) were female, and 85 (85%) were white. The most common type of complications varied by treatment. Twelve of 65 participants (18.5%) in the internal fixation group reported a median nerve compression, while 16 of 26 participants (25.8%) who received external fixation and 13 of 56 participants (23.2%) who received pinning sustained pin site infections. Compared with the internal fixation group, complication rate for any severity complication was higher in participants who initially received casting (adjusted rate ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.22-2.88), whereas the rate for moderate complications was higher in the external fixation group (adjusted rate ratio, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.25-5.09). The distal radius fracture treatment decision-making process for older patients should incorporate a complication profile for each treatment type. For example, external fixation and pinning could be used for patients after apprising them of pin site infection risk. Internal fixation can be done in patients with high functional demands who are willing to receive surgery. Internal fixation use should be substantiated owing to the time and cost involved. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01589692.

Highlights

  • Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the second most prevalent fracture in elderly individuals and affect more than 85 000 older Americans each year.[1,2] Distal radius fractures are associated with substantial increases in health care consumption

  • Compared with the internal fixation group, complication rate for any severity complication was higher in participants who initially received casting, whereas the rate for moderate complications was higher in the external fixation group

  • External fixation and pinning could be used for patients after apprising them of pin site infection risk

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the second most prevalent fracture in elderly individuals and affect more than 85 000 older Americans each year.[1,2] Distal radius fractures are associated with substantial increases in health care consumption. In the 6-month period following a DRF, the average Medicare beneficiary incurs $7700 more in charges relative to prefracture levels.[3,4] Annually, DRFs cost $535 million in direct medical expenses alone.[5] Treatment of DRFs can be managed via casting, internal fixation, external fixation, or percutaneous pinning. Internal fixation maintains fracture alignment but is an invasive surgical procedure. External fixation and pinning are less invasive and less expensive, but pin site infections frequently occur. Despite decades of experience in DRF management, there is no consensus as to the optimal treatment modality, especially for older individuals

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call