Abstract

Efficient ventilation in hospital airborne isolation rooms is important vis-à-vis decreasing the risk of cross infection and reducing energy consumption. This paper analyses the suitability of using a displacement ventilation strategy in airborne infection isolation rooms, focusing on health care worker exposure to pathogens exhaled by infected patients. The analysis is mainly based on numerical simulation results obtained with the support of a 3-D transient numerical model validated using experimental data. A thermal breathing manikin lying on a bed represents the source patient and another thermal breathing manikin represents the exposed individual standing beside the bed and facing the patient. A radiant wall represents an external wall exposed to solar radiation. The air change efficiency index and contaminant removal effectiveness indices and inhalation by the health care worker of contaminants exhaled by the patient are considered in a typical airborne infection isolation room set up with three air renewal rates (6 h-1, 9 h-1 and 12 h-1), two exhaust opening positions and two health care worker positions. Results show that the radiant wall significantly affects the air flow pattern and contaminant dispersion. The lockup phenomenon occurs at the inhalation height of the standing manikin. Displacement ventilation renews the air of the airborne isolation room and eliminates the exhaled pollutants efficiently, but is at a disadvantage compared to other ventilation strategies when the risk of exposure is taken into account.

Highlights

  • Hospital facilities are places with a high risk of cross infection between their occupants

  • This progressive phase displacement might cause the amount of contaminant inhaled by the health care worker (HCW) in each of the three cycle inhalations to differ

  • The phase-averaged method was used in Fig 3 to show the concentration of N2O inhaled by the HCW in 12-second cycles

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Hospital facilities are places with a high risk of cross infection between their occupants. Airflow patterns generated by ventilation systems can be controlled, and recent research has focused on providing good air distribution rather than on maintaining high rates of air renewal as a strategy to reduce the risk of airborne contagion [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Various ventilation strategies such as mixing ventilation (MV) and displacement ventilation (DV) offer different possibilities to protect people from airborne cross infection [10,31]. Some authors report that it is possible to design DV hospital patient rooms that have low human exposure to bio-aerosols that containing pathogens [32,34], in certain situations high exposure may exist in rooms with DV [35,36,37]

Objective and methodology
Results and discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call