Abstract

Abstract: Dams are structures built for controlling the flow of water for many useful purposes such as water supply, power generation, retention of mining and industrial waste, as well as recreation and flood control. However, they bring together some risk of dam body collapse causing damage for the dam downstream areas. Therefore, hypothetical dam break studies which provide mapping of areas potentially attainable in the event of a rupture are especially important for planning actions aiming minimization of associated losses. The aim of this research is to assess the degree of adherence or similarity between flood maps obtained by simulation studies and those effectively obtained from the collapse itself occurred in Dam I owned by Vale SA on January 25, 2019. The study focuses mainly on comparing the effects over the simulated flood maps caused by use of different representation of dam downstream topography relief, namely Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM), Advanced Land Observing Satellite from Alaska Satellite Facility (ALOS_ASF) and Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) models. The simulations were performed using the HEC-RAS software developed by the US Army Corps of Engineers considering hypothesis of strong influence of relief in flood mapping results. In this way, three simulation tests were carried out for evaluation and discussion. In the first simulation, the digital terrain model derived from ALS was used. The second simulation was carried out associating the digital surface model ALOS_ASF with a spatial resolution of 12.5 m. Finally, the SRTM digital elevation model with 30 m spatial resolution provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) was used in third simulation. Results showed better adherence to simulations using data from ALS. This was verified by visual analysis over high resolution orthorectified images and by calculating statistics indicators such as the (F) index. Conclusions pointed out that flood patches resulting from simulation are critical tools for taking actions involving areas and populations to be affected, so the best relief model technologies like ALS data should be used in simulation.

Highlights

  • Dams are structures built with the function of retaining or controlling the flow of water for power generation, water supply, flood control, irrigation, recreation, among other activities

  • How the simulated flood maps resulting from models of different accuracies behaved compared to observed flood maps? So the main contribution of the present paper is analyzing the behaviors of simulated flood maps resulting from free cost low quality Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (SRTM, ALOS_ASF) and cost embedded high quality DTM (ALS) compared to the flood effectively observed and evaluate if the use of surface models such as those derived from Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) and ALOS_ASF are suitable for this type of analysis

  • The working methodology is focused on how and under what conditions using different types of digital elevation models influences the delimitation of the flood and what are the impacts that may arise from the choice of each model evaluating if surface models such as those derived from SRTM and ALOS_ASF are suitable for this type of analysis Figure 1 shows an overall view of the main working steps and the interactions of the stages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dams are structures built with the function of retaining or controlling the flow of water for power generation, water supply, flood control, irrigation, recreation, among other activities. They are built for the purpose of retaining and treating mining and industrial wastes. In Brazil, due to the occurrences observed in the last few years (Fundão dam in Mariana, 2015, Herculano Mineração dam in Itabirito, 2014 and a dam in Miraí, 2007), studies and standards have been produced by regulatory institutions and agencies, such as ANA (National Water Agency) and by ANM (National Mining Agency) in a more intense way, aiming to provide greater security for dam projects (ANM, 2017; ANM, 2020; Brasil, 2020)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call