Abstract

Abstract.— Fingerling rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, were fed for 133 d by one of three feeding methods: one demand feeder per 5.5 m of raceway, 2 demand feeders per 5.5 m of raceway, and hand‐fed controls. Mean weight, total length, mortality, and feed conversion were not influenced by the method of feeding. Size variation did not differ among treatment groups, as assessed by comparing the coefficient of variation of total length. Necropsy‐based health and condition profiles were conducted three times during the rearing period, and results indicated that fish were generally normal and healthy in all treatments. Several parameters differed significantly over time, but no trends were observed except for the fin index and hematocrit. Over time, hematocrit decreased from 48.6 to 45.0%, and the fin index increased from 0.80 to 1.57. Fin index values did not differ among the feeding methods. Fin condition assessed by measuring relative fin length was better in the single feeder treatment than controls for caudal and ventral fins in the last sample. However, since fish from the two‐feeder treatment did not differ from controls, demand feeding per se did not improve fin condition relative to fish that were fed by hand, four to six times per day. The lack of significant improvements in growth or health with the addition of another demand feeder indicated that using more than one feeder per 5.5 m of raceway length is unnecessary for culture of juvenile rainbow trout.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.