Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in different components of students’ critical thinking skills through a sequential series of assignments in pre-pharmacy courses. MethodsFor 3 years, two cohorts of pre-pharmacy students completed an annual ethics-related critical thinking assignment. Progressive, 3-item rubrics (considering context, problem-solving, and innovative thinking) were used to evaluate critical thinking skills on a four-point Likert-type scale (0=not present, 3=mastery) for each year. Rubrics were designed in such a way that equivalent or higher scores indicated advancement in critical thinking skills. Longitudinal changes were assessed using the Friedman test. ResultsStudents’ (n = 44) innovative thinking scores remained the same (p = 0.21), problem-solving scores increased (p < 0.001), and considering context scores regressed (p = 0.01) throughout the three years. Total critical thinking scores also remained the same (p = 0.53). ConclusionsStudents began to formulate new ideas and implement a multifaceted approach when solving problems but remained limited in considering contexts. Thus, students need further education regarding the impact of recognizing multiple perspectives on solving problems.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have