Abstract

BackgroundDetecting mutations in disease genes by full gene sequence analysis is common in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Sanger dideoxy terminator sequencing allows for rapid development and implementation of sequencing assays in the clinical laboratory, but it has limited throughput, and due to cost constraints, only allows analysis of one or at most a few genes in a patient. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), on the other hand, has evolved rapidly, although to date it has mainly been used for large-scale genome sequencing projects and is beginning to be used in the clinical diagnostic testing. One advantage of NGS is that many genes can be analyzed easily at the same time, allowing for mutation detection when there are many possible causative genes for a specific phenotype. In addition, regions of a gene typically not tested for mutations, like deep intronic and promoter mutations, can also be detected.ResultsHere we use 20 previously characterized Sanger-sequenced positive controls in disease-causing genes to demonstrate the utility of NGS in a clinical setting using standard PCR based amplification to assess the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the technology for detecting all previously characterized changes (mutations and benign SNPs). The positive controls chosen for validation range from simple substitution mutations to complex deletion and insertion mutations occurring in autosomal dominant and recessive disorders. The NGS data was 100% concordant with the Sanger sequencing data identifying all 119 previously identified changes in the 20 samples.ConclusionsWe have demonstrated that NGS technology is ready to be deployed in clinical laboratories. However, NGS and associated technologies are evolving, and clinical laboratories will need to invest significantly in staff and infrastructure to build the necessary foundation for success.

Highlights

  • Detecting mutations in disease genes by full gene sequence analysis is common in clinical diagnostic laboratories

  • The analytical sensitivity achieved in our study was 92.7%, and was able to detect all 119 changes which were identified previously using Sanger sequencing

  • It has been suggested by many parties that the importance of targeted gene sequencing panels will decrease as the cost of Next-generation sequencing (NGS) decreases

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Detecting mutations in disease genes by full gene sequence analysis is common in clinical diagnostic laboratories. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), on the other hand, has evolved rapidly, to date it has mainly been used for large-scale genome sequencing projects and is beginning to be used in the clinical diagnostic testing. One advantage of NGS is that many genes can be analyzed at the same time, allowing for mutation detection when there are many possible causative genes for a specific phenotype. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized the way sequencing is being conducted in many research and clinical laboratories. A single next-generation instrument is able to sequence a whole human genome at 7.4-fold coverage in two months [2]. The International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium of 20 laboratories worldwide took approximately 15 months to perform the same work [4]. Third-generation sequencers, like the Ion Torrent and Pacific Biosciences systems, have emerged as viable alternatives to the four next-generation sequencers and have started to appear in laboratories [6,7]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call