Abstract

Monitoring the sea ice cover is important for both climate studies and ice operations, such as shipping. It is challenging to validate even basic essential variables, such as the sea ice extent, due to a lack of appropriate validation data. Instead of focusing on validation, this paper looks at the use of categorical triple collocation (CTC) for the task of quantitatively comparing three colocated data sets. CTC has been developed and used in earlier studies to rank binary data sets. In this paper, we extend earlier studies and bring in recent results from the binary classification community to estimate the class imbalance (the relative proportion of each class, ice or water). We then use this class imbalance to obtain quantitative estimates of the proportion correct of ice (sensitivity) and the proportion correct of water (specificity). The methodology is first tested using toy data, after which three data sets from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence, on the east coast of Canada, are used. These data sets are from an ice–ocean model, a passive microwave sea ice concentration retrieval, and a sea ice concentration retrieval from synthetic aperture radar (SAR). By looking at both the sensitivity and the specificity, it is found that the passive microwave data have difficulty in recognizing ice during freeze-up, but they perform well at obtaining the correct water observations. This distinction cannot be made by ranking the data sets. The CTC method is compared with, and found to be complementary to, a validation using ice/water states from the interactive multisensor snow and ice mapping system.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call