Abstract

The relationship between various semen evaluation tests and fertility in fertile and subfertile artificial insemination (AI) boars was examined. In total, 36 boars, 19 Finnish Landrace and 17 Yorkshire, were included. The average value of three ejaculates extended in an X-cell extender from each boar was used in the analysis. Based on nonreturn results (NR60d, later referred to nonreturn rate, NR%), the boars were divided into two groups: those with poor fertility (NR% < 80, n = 19) and those with normal or above average nonreturn rates (NR% = 83, n = 17). Semen quality was determined after 1 and 7 days of storage at 17 °C. Sperm motility before and after each methanol stress was assessed both subjectively and using a computer-assisted semen analyzer (CASA). The sperm cells were stained with calcein AM and propidium iodide and evaluated for plasma membrane integrity under an epifluorescence microscope. Propidium iodide and Hoechst 33258 dyes were used in parallel to stain sperm cells for fluorometric analysis with an automatic fluorometer. Sperm morphology was evaluated in stained smears. The percentage of sows reported as not having returned to estrus within 60 days after AI (nonreturn rate, NR%) and litter size of primiparous and multiparous farrowings were used as measures of fertility. Of the parameters analyzed, only CASA-assessed total sperm motility and methanol-stressed total sperm motility correlated significantly ( P < 0.05) with nonreturn rate. Those tests presenting the highest correlation with nonreturn rate were CASA-assessed total motility ( r = 0.54, P < 0.01) and subjective sperm motility ( r = 0.52, P < 0.01) after 7 days of storage. The highest correlation with fertility at 1 day of storage was shown by methanol-stressed total sperm motility assessed with the CASA ( r = 0.46, P < 0.01). The only semen parameter that correlated significantly ( r = 0.37, P < 0.05) with litter size of multiparous farrowings was viability of seven-day stored semen stained with Hoechst 33258 and analyzed with a fluorometer. The methanol stress test described here could serve as a rapid test whose results could be used to predict NR% better than motility.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.