Abstract

Cross-country skiing is a popular Olympic winter sport, which is also used extensively as a recreational activity. While cross-country skiing primarily is regarded as a demanding endurance activity it is also technically challenging, as it contains two main styles (classical and skating) and many sub-techniques within these styles. To further understand the physiological demands and technical challenges of cross-country skiing it is imperative to identify sub-techniques and basic motion features during training and competitions. Therefore, this paper presents features for identification and assessment of the basic motion patterns used during classical-style cross-country skiing. The main motivation for this work is to contribute to the development of a more detailed platform for comparing and communicating results from technique analysis methods, to prevent unambiguous definitions and to allow more precise discussions and quality assessments of an athlete's technical ability. To achieve this, our paper proposes formal motion components and classical style technique definitions as well as sub-technique classifiers. This structure is general and can be used directly for other cyclic activities with clearly defined and distinguishable sub-techniques, such as the skating style in cross country skiing. The motion component features suggested in our approach are arm synchronization, leg kick, leg kick direction, leg kick rotation, foot/ski orientation and energy like measures of the arm, and leg motion. By direct measurement, estimation, and the combination of these components, the traditional sub-techniques of diagonal stride, double poling, double poling kick, herringbone, as well as turning techniques can be identified. By assuming that the proposed definitions of the classical XC skiing sub-techniques are accepted, the presented classifier is proven to map measures from the motion component definitions to a unique representation of the sub-techniques. This formalization and structure may be used on new motion components, measurement principles, and classifiers, and therefore provides a framework for comparing different methodologies. Pilot data from a group of high-level cross-country skiers employing inertial measurement sensors placed on the athlete's arms and skis are used to demonstrate the approach. The results show how detailed sub-technique information can be coupled with physical, track, and environmental data to analyze the effects of specific motion patterns, to develop useful debriefing tools for coaches and athletes in training and competition settings, and to explore new research hypotheses.

Highlights

  • Cross-country (XC) skiing is a popular Olympic winter sport but is used extensively as a recreational activity

  • This may seem to be a strange disagreement as the arm correlation is a strong and generally robust discriminant. The reason for this disagreement lies within the Definitions 3 and that these cycles are in the transition from diagonal stride (DIA) to typically DK or double poling (DP)

  • These cycles, or half cycles, contain mainly correlated arm movement and leg work and are in accordance with the presented decision functions classified as DK, which is not in accordance with the from DIA (fDIA) rule in Definition 3 a) where these cycles were considered an extension of the DIA class

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cross-country (XC) skiing is a popular Olympic winter sport but is used extensively as a recreational activity. XC skiing is regarded as one of the most demanding of endurance sports and involves competitions on varying terrain where skiers employ different sub-techniques of the classical and skating styles. These sub-techniques include different technical features that require upper- and/or lower-body work to different extents. XC skiers are continuously changing between and adapting the sub-techniques of the classical style—diagonal stride (DIA), double poling (DP), double poling with a kick (DK), and herringbone (HRB)— and skating style—paddle dance (G2), double dance (G3), single dance (G4), and skating without poles (G5)—to the varying terrain. XC skiers design their training to improve their physiological capacities, and their technical and tactical expertise (Smith, 1992; Nilsson et al, 2004; Andersson et al, 2010; Bolger et al, 2015; Sandbakk and Holmberg, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call