Assessment of Baseline Ultrawidefield Fluorescein Angiographic Quantitative Leakage Parameters with Ultrawidefield Fundus Features and Clinical Parameters in Diabetic Retinopathy in Protocol AA

Abstract

PurposeEvaluate quantitative leakage parameters on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA) images and explore their association with Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS), predominantly peripheral lesions (PPLs), visual acuity, and clinical characteristics. DesignA post-hoc analysis of baseline UWF-FA images in the DRCR Retina Network observational study Protocol AA. ParticipantsN = 575 eyes from 384 adults across 38 sites in the US and Canada with gradable UWF-FA. MethodsA machine learning-enhanced feature extraction platform provided initial leakage segmentation of UWF-FA images sequentially reviewed and corrected by two certified readers for segmentation accuracy. UWF-FA leakage was measured in five retinal zones: panretinal (whole retina), central macular (3-disc diameter fovea-centered circle), posterior pole (6-disc diameter fovea-centered circle), peripheral (outside 6-disc diameter circle) and widefield far peripheral (outside 9-disc diameter circle); associations with clinical factors were evaluated with marginal beta regression models. Main Outcome MeasuresUWF-FA leakage index, calculated as the area with leakage divided by the analyzable retinal area. ResultsThe mean quantitative leakage index was 3.5% for panretinal, 6.6% for macular, 4.8% for posterior pole, 3.3% for peripheral and 2.8% for wide-field far peripheral retinal zones. Panretinal leakage was associated with DRSS (mean 2.2% for no to mild NPDR, 3.4% for moderate NPDR, 4.2% for moderately severe NPDR, 4.8% for severe NPDR and 5.1% for PDR; P<.001), HbA1c (3.2% for HbA1c <8% vs. 3.8% for HbA1c ≥8%; P=.01 for continuous HbA1c), visual acuity (3.3% for 20/25 or better vs. 4.7% for 20/32 or worse; continuous P<.001), and UWF-FA-PPL types of IRMA (4.3% vs. 3.3%; P=.005) or NVE (5.7% vs. 3.4%; P=.003). DRSS was also statistically significant for leakage within all retinal zones (P<.001); eyes with non-central DME versus no DME had higher mean leakage in the central macular (11.2% vs. 5.9%; P=0.005) and posterior pole regions (9.2% vs. 4.2%; P=.002). ConclusionQuantitative UWF-FA leakage analysis identified associations between leakage and DRSS, visual acuity, and presence of DME. In the future, quantitative UWF-FA leakage parameters may be explored as potential biomarkers for disease progression risk.