Abstract

Ecological niche models use presence-only data, which is often affected by lack of true absences leading to sampling bias. Over the last decade, there has been an uptick in the integration of occurrence data from global positioning systems telemetry data in ecological niche models and/or species distribution models. These data types can be affected by serial autocorrelation at high relocation frequencies yet have been used in ecological niche models using geographic filters and subsampling techniques. Yet, no study to date has attempted to discern a method to identify the appropriate time interval for a particular species if integrating GPS telemetry occurrence data in a MaxEnt framework. We demonstrate a rigorous spatial technique using a robust contemporary dataset from ocelots (Leopardus pardalis) to assess the appropriate time intervals to use in a species-specific ecological niche model. We assessed a range of daily time intervals (every 0.5, 1–4, 6, 8, and 12 h) commonly used in teresstrial mammalian carnivore studies. We observed the predictive performance of shorter time intervals every 2 h was comparable to much longer intervals every 12 h. These shorter intervals under/overestimated the least amount of data compared to 12 h. This study demonstrates that by accounting for serial autocorrelation and conducting rigorous spatial analyses, scientists can identify the appropriate time interval to integrate GPS telemetry data use in ecological niche models in MaxEnt. These results can also be transferable across highly mobile terrestrial taxa at different spatial scales, which can help inform species management or conservation strategies.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call