Assessment of approaches to estimate scapular orientation in children with brachial plexus birth injury

Abstract

BackgroundChallenges in measuring dynamic scapular orientation limit assessment of scapulothoracic and glenohumeral contributions to shoulder function in children with brachial plexus birth injury (BPBI). Double calibration acromion marker cluster (D-AMC) and linear model approaches have been validated to estimate scapular motion in healthy adults, but neither has been evaluated in BPBI. Research questionAre the linear model and D-AMC approaches able to accurately estimate scapular orientation in children with BPBI at functional arm postures? MethodsSeventeen children with BPBI positioned their affected limbs in 11 static positions while their segment orientations were measured with motion capture. Linear model and D-AMC estimates of scapular orientation were compared against palpation at six of the static positions with functional relevance to BPBI using a three-way repeat measures ANOVA and a comparison of root mean square errors (RMSE) against literature AMC values for healthy adults. ResultsThe D-AMC was similar to palpation across all positions and scapular axes while the linear model differed from palpation in a few instances. RMSEs of the D-AMC (3.7–14.8°) and particularly the linear model (4.6–24.8°) were generally at or beyond the upper range of past AMC analyses on healthy adults (1.6–14.2°), especially for more complex, multiplanar arm postures. Despite the D-AMC outperforming the linear model, this approach still produced clinically meaningful (>10°) errors for roughly (12.7–22.5%) of subjects. SignificanceCurrent methods for estimating dynamic scapular orientation remain less than ideal for BPBI. Use of the D-AMC may be appropriate to gain broad insights into general dynamic scapulothoracic and glenohumeral function; however, given their potential for producing clinically meaningful errors, the D-AMC and linear model are not recommended for diagnostic purposes or outcomes assessment on an individual patient basis unless their patient-specific accuracy has been evaluated and confirmed prior to use.