Abstract
Despite the prevalence of concussion in soldiers deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan, neuropsychological tests used to assist in concussion management have not been validated on the battlefield. This study evaluated the validity of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) in the combat environment. Cases meeting criteria for concussion, healthy controls, and injured controls were assessed. Soldiers were administered the ANAM, traditional neuropsychological tests, and a background questionnaire. Cases were enrolled within 72 h of concussion. Cases exhibited poorer performance than controls on all ANAM subtests, with significant differences on simple reaction time (SRT), procedural reaction time (PRT), code substitution, and matching to sample (p<.001). Discriminant ability of scores on SRT and PRT subtests was 71%, which improved to 76% when pre-deployment baseline scores were available. An exploratory clinical decision tool incorporating ANAM scores and symptoms improved discriminant ability to 81%. Results provide initial validation of the ANAM for detecting acute effects of battlefield concussion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
