Abstract
ObjectiveIn this article, IDAC-Dose2.1 and OLINDA computer codes are compared as they are the most widely used software tools for internal dosimetry assessment at the present time. OLINDA/EXM personal computer code was created as a replacement for the widely used MIRDOSE3.1 code. IDAC-Dose2.1 was developed based on the ICRP specific absorbed fractions and computational framework of internal dose assessment given for reference adults in ICRP Publication 133. IDAC uses cumulated activities per administered activity in hours and calculates the absorbed dose and the effective dose. The program calculates the dose in the Eckerman stylized family phantoms. It is useful in standardizing and automating internal dose calculations, assessing doses in clinical trials with radiopharmaceuticals, making theoretic calculations for existing pharmaceuticals, teaching, and other purposes. MethodsTo produce such a comparison, the results of this work were compared with available published data in the literature on radiopharmaceuticals. Radiopharmaceuticals with 89Zr, 153Sm, 177Lu radionuclides are used as the basis for the comparison. 89Zr, 153Sm, 177Lu radionuclides are regarded as the future of radiopharmaceutical treatment. For 89Zr, two different labelled carriers, Zr-89_cMAb U36 and Zr-89 Panitumumab, were used on patients. ResultsThe results show a clear difference in terms of absorbed dose of the Zr-89 radiopharmaceuticals for red bone marrow when calculated by IDAC-Dose2.1 (0.76 mGy/MBq), while the estimated absorbed dose in literature results is 0.07 mGy/MBq and 0.14 mGy/MBq when the calculation is done by OLINDA program. In the case of 177Lu-EDTMP, the absorbed dose in red bone marrow is in reasonable agreement (0.63 mGy/MBq and 0.8 mGy/MBq for IDAC-Dose2.1 and OLINDA, respectively). A significant difference was found for the absorbed dose in the bone surface, which was almost twice as high for OLINDA (2.1 mGy/MBq for IDAC-Dose2.1 and 5.4 mGy/MBq for OLINDA). In some direct cases, the calculated absorbed dose in the urinary bladder wall with OLINDA is ten times higher compared to WinAct (which was utilized to calculate the total activity in the organs and tissues) and IDAC 2.1. These results are considered key to greater accuracy in internal dose calculation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
