Assessment of a New Tipless Nitinol Stone Basket and Comparison with an Existing Flat-Wire Basket

Abstract

Flexible nephroscopes and ureteroscopes make it possible to see calculi in remote calices, but it is often impossible to remove these with existing technology. Flat-wire baskets impede deflection and can traumatize the papilla. This study compares the performance of a new 3.2F tipless nickel-titanium (Nitinol) basket with that of an existing 3.0F flat-wire basket. Specifications were compared using a 15F nephroscope and a 7.5F flexible ureteroscope in a pig kidney model. A calculus was placed in a calix, and the author and two residents were timed while using both baskets to retrieve the stone. To open fully, the flat-wire basket needed to protrude 1.2 cm further than the tipless basket. The tipless basket did not restrict deflection of the nephroscope, whereas the flat-wire basket limited flexion by 24 degrees and extension by 28 degrees. The tipless basket did not restrict extension of the 7.5F ureteroscope but limited flexion by 10 degrees. The flat-wire basket limited flexion by 79 degrees and extension by 72 degrees. Using the pig kidney model, the three operators took a mean of 5.3, 11.8, and 6.4 seconds to catch the stone with the tipless basket. Using the flat-wire basket, the mean times were 15.3, 34.5, and 28.9 seconds (combined data: 8.2 seconds for the tipless basket and 27.8 seconds with the flat-wire basket; P = 0.0001). Only the flat-wire basket was seen to traumatize the papilla. The Nitinol tipless basket has significant advantages over the flat-wire basket.