Abstract

Assessment forms an integral part of the learning process in higher education where knowledge is tested and applied in various ways. While various methods are employed by assessors ranging from formative to summative assessments, a high degree of integrity is required from those tasked with assessing the students. Ethics, honesty and integrity are the forgotten pillars of assessment which often do not reflect in the assessment task but in the individuals tasked with ensuring academic quality.This qualitative study must be understood as an attempt to close the gap in the literature and to provide a deeper understanding of: the assessment challenges faced by students with disabilities in Higher Education (HE); accommodations which are being offered and other measures which are in place to enhance inclusive assessment; and suggested strategies to promote inclusive assessment of students with disabilities (SwDs) in HE. Data collection involved individual interviews and focus group discussion with students with various impairments on their assessment experiences. Findings reveal that generally SwDs still face assessment challenges although there are marked improvements on their accommodations. Lack of access to information in accessible formats, lack of computer and Braille skills were also cited as challenges SwDs were facing. Participants expressed satisfaction on how examinations were administered as they could write using the modes they were comfortable with. These modes included audio, Brailling and use of computers. Students applauded the University as it allowed them extra time for writing their examinations. Participants also expressed attitudinal as well as financial challenges during their work related learning/teaching practice in addition to lack of Braille and computer skills by both learners and staff.. The study concludes that SwDs still experience assessment challenges although to some extent HEIs have put in place some practices to the benefit of SwDs. In light of the foregoing findings and conclusions, the researchers therefore recommend the following: The University should invest in assistive technologies including embossers, scanners and the relevant software like JAWS for the benefit of students with disabilities The university should equip staff with such basic skills like Brailling and training in basic disability issues through regular disability awareness campaigns The Institution should incentivise helpers of students with disabilities in the form of, for example free accommodation The University should establish a Disability Resource Unit and engage a fulltime Disability Resource Unit Officer The university should sensitize staff and students about the Disability Policy and walk the talk in its implementation. The government should complement by paying some allowances to University SwDs on Work Related Learning/Teaching Practice to enable them meet extra costs associated with their impairments Keywords: Assessment, Alternative assessment, Inclusive assessment, Summative assessment, Formative assessment, Students with disabilities. DOI : 10.7176/JEP/10-18-06 Publication date :June 30 th 2019

Highlights

  • Assessment is a critical component of the curriculum of any educational institution. Tennant, McMullen and Kaczynski (2010:93) argue that “assessment is a significant lever for change and improvement in students’ learning experiences in higher education”

  • The results indicate that 63% of the respondents said their access to tertiary education was very easy, support for their needs was not assured as universities and colleges mostly address physical accessibility and focus less on pedagogical, assessment, psychological and social accessibility

  • The assessment tasks that lecturers provide to their students were both summative to determine students’ knowledge, skills and attitudes and contribute to their final grades and formative designed to provide feedback and enrich students’ learning

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Assessment is a critical component of the curriculum of any educational institution. Tennant, McMullen and Kaczynski (2010:93) argue that “assessment is a significant lever for change and improvement in students’ learning experiences in higher education”. Assessment can either be formative (continuous) or summative to determine students’ knowledge, skills, attitudes and contribute to their final grade. It can either be informal through observations and or oral questions, or formal through final examinations (Gebrehiwot, 2015). For this to happen, assessment should follow certain principles, one of which is fairness. Assessment should follow certain principles, one of which is fairness This ensures that no student is disadvantaged or advantaged (Shepherd, 2006). This ensures that no student is disadvantaged or advantaged (Shepherd, 2006). Chataika (2007) emphasised the significance of flexibility in the mode of measurement so that the principle of fairness is realized in assessment

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call