Abstract
BackgroundScar quality is affected by patients’ wound healing conditions, trauma type, and skin features that differ due to ethnicity. Despite tremendous improvements in scar remodeling techniques, conspicuous scars can still remain postoperatively. Non-surgical methods used for handling scars include the use of topical corticosteroids, pressure therapy, lasers, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). This study aimed to assess and evaluate different non-surgical modalities for treating immature facial scars. MethodsFifteen patients with scars were included for non-surgical management. They received one or more of 5 treatments: corticosteroid injection, topical silicone gel application with or without bandage, pressure therapy, lasers, or PRP injection. Scars were assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and serial photographs. ResultsThere were no significant differences in the results obtained using POSAS. None of the patients required a secondary intervention or sought a second opinion. The rate of complications associated with the treatments were very minor. ConclusionGood assessment of patient characteristics, proper planning, and appropriate treatment lead to favorable outcomes.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
