Abstract

Assessment and instructional decision-making practices were documented for a national sample of teachers serving handicapped preschool children. All had been nominated as “good” teachers. Surveys of 60 teachers and in-depth interviews of an additional 10 revealed that evaluation and monitoring procedures are not used systematically or regularly. Behavioral observations were the most widely used single source of information for making instructional decisions. Teacher self-reports indicated that criterion-referenced measures provided the information used most often in developing IEPs and in monitoring student progress, while progress on previous IEP objectives was used most often in changing IEPs. This sample of teachers of handicapped preschool children did not regularly or systematically engage in direct and continuous monitoring of pupil progress.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.