Abstract

The presence of highway construction zones hinders mobility and affects traffic operations. A 2002 study by Wunderlich & Hardesty reported that nearly 20% of the National Highway System roads have scheduled construction work during the peak construction season. Additionally, approximately 24% of non-recurring delays on freeways are caused by work zones. To minimize time lost by travelers due to work zone induced traffic congestion, it is important to efficiently plan temporary traffic control (TTC) at work zones. Earlier research conducted by Sisiopiku & Ramadan, 2017 confirms that the majority of State Departments of Transportation currently rely on their earlier experience when planning for work zones, rather than consider operational and safety impacts. Using a study corridor in Birmingham, Alabama as a test bed, this study investigated the operational impacts of TTC options for work zones with 3-to-1 lane drop configuration using traffic data collected from the Alabama Department of Transportation. The VISSIM simulation platform was used to conduct the experiments. The experimental design considered two TTC strategies (i.e., static late and early merge) under 3-to-1 lane drop configuration for work-space length of 500 ft for long- and short-term lane closures. The study concluded that the 3-to-1 lane-drop configuration should not be scheduled for long-term duration. Maintenance work can be scheduled from midnight to early morning and under the 3-to-1 lane closure scenario the performance of early and late merge traffic control is similar. Overall, this study used simulation modeling to compare the effectiveness of two traffic control strategies at work zones on the basis of different performance measures. The results provide information about the impact of each control strategy on density, speed, travel time etc. They also help determine what time of the day is best for lane closings in order to reduce adverse impacts from capacity reduction. Thus, the findings are expected to provide valuable guidance for agencies responsible for planning, design, and operations of work zones in the future.

Highlights

  • Maintenance and rehabilitation work are very important for proper functioning of roadways

  • Using a study corridor in Birmingham, Alabama as a test bed, this study investigated the operational impacts of temporary traffic control (TTC) options for work zones with 3-to-1 lane drop configuration using traffic data collected from the Alabama Department of Transportation

  • This study investigated the operational impacts of two temporary traffic control (TTC) strategies, namely static late and early merge control with 3-to-1 lane-drop configurations for a hypothetical work zone at a corridor along Interstate 65 (I-65) in Birmingham, AL

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Maintenance and rehabilitation work are very important for proper functioning of roadways. Several states opt for construction work on the existing roadways to improve roadway condition and serve the traveling public. Lane closures are required whenever there is an active work zone. Nearly 20% of the US National Highway System roads have construction work during the peak construction season [1] and there is a possibility that a driver would confront one active work zone out of every hundred miles driven on the highway [2]. Work zones reduce the capacity of roadways and affect traffic flow at merge points [3]. Vehicles can drive at regular speed, but speeds may decline by 31.6% to 56.1% of the regular speed at work zones [4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call