Abstract
In autologistic regression models employed in the analysis of species’ spatial distributions, an additional explanatory variable, the autocovariate, is used to correct the effect of spatial autocorrelation. The values of the autocovariate depend on the values of the response variable in the neighbourhood. While this approach has been widely used over the last ten years in biogeographical analyses, it has not been assessed for its validity and performance against artificial simulation data with known properties. I here present such an assessment, varying the range and strength of spatial autocorrelation in the data as well as the prevalence of the focal species. Autologistic regression models consistently underestimate the effect of the environmental variable in the model and give biased estimates compared to a non-spatial logistic regression. A comparison with other methods available for the correction of spatial autocorrelation shows that autologistic regression is more biased and less reliable and hence should be used only in concert with other reference methods.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
