Abstract
In recent years, soil screening levels have been adopted by regulatory agencies for certain per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to assess the risk of groundwater contamination through leaching. These soil screening levels, determined using an established equilibrium-based partitioning equation, have high variability among regulatory groups largely attributed to the diverse reported partitioning coefficients in the literature. This variability between reported partitioning coefficients, and subsequently soil screening levels, is due to the complex leaching behavior of PFAS not being predicted well by the standard equilibrium-based model. This has led one regulatory group to require batch leaching to assess risk rather than setting default soil screening levels based on partitioning equations. In this work, we conducted leaching experiments on five field-sampled soils impacted by aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF), following Leaching Environmental Assessment Framework (LEAF) Method 1316 and compared the results to expected leaching utilizing an equilibrium-based partitioning equation commonly employed by regulatory agencies to establish soil screening levels. Our analysis found among the six PFAS detected in the soils, which have regulatory leaching thresholds established, the partitioning values assumed by the U.S. EPA exhibited the highest accuracy in predicting leachate concentrations. These partitioning values predicted actual leaching within a ± 20 % margin of error for approximately 50 % of sample points, highlighting limitations in relying solely on equilibrium-based partitioning values as predictors of leaching behavior. This discrepancy between predicted and actual leaching has implications for site managers and regulatory entities overseeing PFAS-contaminated sites, suggesting that soil screening level determinations for PFAS might need to be revised to account for the unique transport characteristics of PFAS.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.