Assessing the stops framework for coping with intraoperative errors: Evidence of efficacy, hints of hubris, and a bridge to abridging burnout

Abstract

BackgroundAnswering calls in the literature, we developed and introduced an evidence-based tool for surgeons facing errors in the operating room: the STOPS framework (stop, talk to you team, obtain help, plan, succeed). The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of presenting this psychological tool on resident coping in the operating room and the related outcome of burnout while examining sex differences. MethodsIn a natural experiment, general surgery residents were invited to attend 2 separate educational conferences regarding coping with errors in the operating room. Three months later, all residents were asked to fill out a survey assessing their coping in the operating room, level of burnout, and demographics. We assessed the impact of the educational intervention by comparing those who attended the coping conferences with those who did not attend. ResultsThirty-five residents responded to the survey (65% response rate, 54% female respondents, 49% junior residents). Our hypothesized moderated mediation model was supported. Sex was found to moderate the impact of the STOPS framework—female residents who attended the coping educational conference reported higher coping self-efficacy, whereas attendance had no statistically significant impact on male levels of coping self-efficacy. In turn, higher coping self-efficacy was associated with lower levels of burnout. ConclusionOur results suggest that there is evidence of efficacy in this instruction—female residents presented this material report higher levels of coping in the operating room compared to those who did not receive the framework. Further, increase in coping ability was associated with reduced levels of burnout for both genders.