Abstract
Manually curating chemicals, diseases and their relationships is significantly important to biomedical research, but it is plagued by its high cost and the rapid growth of the biomedical literature. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in developing computational approaches for automatic chemical-disease relation (CDR) extraction. Despite these attempts, the lack of a comprehensive benchmarking dataset has limited the comparison of different techniques in order to assess and advance the current state-of-the-art. To this end, we organized a challenge task through BioCreative V to automatically extract CDRs from the literature. We designed two challenge tasks: disease named entity recognition (DNER) and chemical-induced disease (CID) relation extraction. To assist system development and assessment, we created a large annotated text corpus that consisted of human annotations of chemicals, diseases and their interactions from 1500 PubMed articles. 34 teams worldwide participated in the CDR task: 16 (DNER) and 18 (CID). The best systems achieved an F-score of 86.46% for the DNER task—a result that approaches the human inter-annotator agreement (0.8875)—and an F-score of 57.03% for the CID task, the highest results ever reported for such tasks. When combining team results via machine learning, the ensemble system was able to further improve over the best team results by achieving 88.89% and 62.80% in F-score for the DNER and CID task, respectively. Additionally, another novel aspect of our evaluation is to test each participating system’s ability to return real-time results: the average response time for each team’s DNER and CID web service systems were 5.6 and 9.3 s, respectively. Most teams used hybrid systems for their submissions based on machining learning. Given the level of participation and results, we found our task to be successful in engaging the text-mining research community, producing a large annotated corpus and improving the results of automatic disease recognition and CDR extraction.Database URL: http://www.biocreative.org/tasks/biocreative-v/track-3-cdr/
Highlights
Introduction and motivationChemicals, diseases and their relations are among the most searched topics by PubMed users worldwide [1, 2], reflecting their central roles in many areas of biomedical research and healthcare such as drug discovery and safety surveillance
A total of 25 teams submitted 34 systems for testing in the chemical-disease relations (CDR) task: 16 systems were tested in conjunction with the disease named entity recognition (DNER) task, and 18 for the chemicalinduced disease (CID) task
To determine the difficulty of DNER and CID tasks, we examined how many teams correctly identified each of the gold standard DNER concepts and CID relations in the test set
Summary
Diseases and their relations are among the most searched topics by PubMed users worldwide [1, 2], reflecting their central roles in many areas of biomedical research and healthcare such as drug discovery and safety surveillance. The ultimate goal in drug discovery is to develop chemicals for therapeutics, recognition of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) between chemicals and diseases is important for improving chemical safety and toxicity studies and facilitating new screening assays for pharmaceutical compound survival. Manual annotation of such mechanistic and biomarker/ correlative chemical-disease relations (CDR) from unstructured free text into structured knowledge to facilitate identification of potential toxicity has been an important theme for several bioinformatics databases, such as the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD; http:// ctdbase.org/) [5]. NOTE: We consider the words ‘drug’ and ‘chemical’ to be interchangeable in this document
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.