Abstract
Medium-frequency normal modes in the frequency range of 2.0–6.0mHz excited by moderate earthquakes (6.0<Mw<7.0) are weak seismic signals and seldom concerned in academic study. We show that the validity of predicted M0 (scalar seismic moment) for a complex moderate earthquake can be effectively assessed by a systematic comparison of observed and synthetic medium-frequency spheroidal modes, and the effect of lateral heterogeneity on normal-mode amplitudes can also be well assessed in the comparison. For a complex moderate earthquake, the differences between predicted M0 derived from different inversion methods are significant, in some cases as large as factors of 1.56–3.18. In this study we focus on the Lushan earthquake, a moderate thrust event on 20 April 2013 in the Western Sichuan, China. Five reported M0 for the earthquake differ significantly from 0.4×1019 to 1.06×1019Nm, up to about 2.5 times difference. To assess the validity of reported M0, we compare observed with synthetic modes corresponding to five centroid moment tensor solutions at 17 stations, which located within epicental distances of 5–30° and distributed in a wide range of source-receiver azimuths. Synthetic modes corresponding to moment tensor solutions derived from long-period waveforms show good agreement to observations. However, synthetics corresponding to moment tensor solutions derived from body waves display significant deviations of amplitudes from observations. We show underestimate of M0 is the main cause for such a large deviation. Another important result obtained from the comparison is that lateral heterogeneity has very little effects on the amplitudes of spherical modes at frequencies below 6.0mHz. This observational result is inconsistent with previous theoretical result of lateral structure perturbations to normal modes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.