Abstract

Ring chromosome 20 syndrome (r(20)) is an ultra‐rare disease characterized by drug‐refractory epilepsy, cognitive impairment, and behavioral problems. Nonpharmacological treatments alongside antiepileptic drugs early after diagnosis may help reduce seizure frequency and preserve cognition. Ketogenic dietary therapy (KDT) has benefitted children with complex, refractory epilepsies, but its efficacy in r(20) is unknown. We assessed clinical prescription, implementation, and patient experience of KDT in r(20) through online surveys and a workshop. Forty‐two patients, families, carers, and 23 healthcare professionals completed the surveys. While nearly all patients were familiar with KDT, only half had tried it. Significant improvement in seizure activity, cognition, and alertness was reported; side effects were typically mild but with one report of increased seizure frequency. A high rate of co‐morbidity, older age at presentation, behavioral problems, and cognitive impairment can make implementing KDT in r(20) challenging. In the UK, NHS KDT services are predominantly available to pediatric patients, with very limited adult access. A health economic analysis illustrating reduced acute care costs or improved quality of life may support more widespread KDT implementation. Growing evidence supports KDT as an effective and safe intervention, but further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of r(20) and its interaction with ketosis.

Highlights

  • Ring chromosome 20 syndrome (r(20)) is an ultra-rare epilepsy with fewer than 150 cases reported worldwide[1]

  • Results informed the development of two online surveys to assess Ketogenic dietary therapy (KDT) use and experience in r(20) for healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients, families, and carers (PFCs), and to gather basic demographic, diagnostic, and clinical care information to benefit the current understanding of r(20)

  • Seizure onset and r(20) diagnosis most often occurred by age 12 (93% and 74%, respectively); 48% of patients were adults. 81% of patients were prescribed more than 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with one PFC respondent indicating “6 or more.”

Read more

Summary

Funding information

This work was supported by the University of Cambridge Public Engagement Starter Fund, awarded to TFH and LC. The Patient Led Research Hub receives indirect support from the National Institute for Health Research via the Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit and Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre.

| INTRODUCTION
| Literature search and survey development
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call