Abstract

Smeed (1949) provided a regression model for estimating road traffic fatalities (RTFs). In this paper, a modified form of Smeed’s (1949) model is proposed for which it is shown that the multiplicative error term is less than that of Smeed’s original model for most situations. Based on this Modified Smeed’s model, Bayesian and multilevel methods are developed to assess the risk of road traffic fatalities across sub populations of a given geographical zone. These methods consider the parameters of the Smeed’s model to be random variables and therefore make it possible to compute variances across space provided there is significant intercept variation of the regression equation across such regions. Using data from Ghana, the robustness of the Bayesian estimates was indicated at low sample sizes with respect to the Normal, Laplace and Cauchy prior distributions. Thus the Bayesian and Multilevel methods performed at least as well as the traditional method of estimating parameters and beyond this were able to assess risk differences through variability of these parameters in space.

Highlights

  • Smeed (1949) proposed a model for estimating road traffic fatalities (RTFs) in his paper

  • Until t = T. 2.3 Multilevel Random Coefficient (MRC) Model we develop a Multilevel Analysis approach to estimate the regional distribution of parameters based on the modified Smeed’s model and use them to compare the risk of RTFs across geographical regions

  • At a sample size of 15 or more, the model becomes insensitive to the prior distribution

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Smeed (1949) proposed a model for estimating road traffic fatalities (RTFs) in his paper. He showed that the formula D N P. The seven models, including that of Smeed’s, were tested for fitness with the actual data. Smeed’s model was found to give the best fit He showed that the original Smeed formulation cannot be discounted due to reasons cited by many researchers. This is because Smeed's model is parsimonious in parameter usage. According to Ponnaluri (2012), Smeed's model appears to be observation-driven, evidence-based, and logically valid in measuring the per vehicle fatality rate

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.