Abstract
CR Climate Research Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsSpecials CR 73:7-15 (2017) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01437 Assessing the resilient provision of ecosystem services by social-ecological systems: introduction and theory Simo Sarkki1,*, Andrej Ficko2, Frans E. Wielgolaski3, Eleni M. Abraham4, Svetla Bratanova-Doncheva5, Karsten Grunewald6, Annika Hofgaard7, Friedrich-Karl Holtmeier8,9, Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos10, Gabriele Broll11, Maria Nijnik12, Marja-Liisa Sutinen13,† 1Cultural Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities, PO Box 1000, University of Oulu, Oulu 90014, Finland 2University of Ljubljana, Biotechnical Faculty, Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Vecna pot 83, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia 3Department of Bioscience, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway 4Laboratory of Range Science (236), School of Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece 5IBER-Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2 ‘Major Gagarin’ Str., 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria 6Leibniz-Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Weberplatz 1, 01217 Dresden, Germany 7Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, PO Box 5685, Sluppen, 7485 Trondheim, Norway 8Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany 9Dionysiusstraße 6, 48329 Havixbeck, Germany 10Department of Forestry and Management of the Environment and Natural Resources, Democritus University of Thrace, 193 Pantazidou Str., 68200 Orestiada, Greece 11University of Osnabrueck, Seminarstr. 19, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany 12Social, Economic and Geographical Sciences Group, The James Hutton Institute, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB15 8QH, UK 13Muhos Research Station, LUKE, Kirkkosaarentie 7, 91500 Muhos, Finland *Corresponding author: simo.sarkki@oulu.fi†Deceased‑Advance View was available online February 7, 2017 ABSTRACT: The concepts of resilience and ecosystem services broaden the opportunities for assessing sustainability of social-ecological systems (SESs). The lack of operational frameworks for assessing the resilient provision of ecosystem services by SESs impedes greater integration of resilience thinking in natural resource governance. The greatest challenge so far has been to understand the capacity of the SES to (re)organize itself and sustain the flow of benefits from nature to people under various global and local pressures and trade-offs between ecosystem services users. To assess the resilience of an SES within a single framework, we propose a new approach which is a combination of: (1) the Driver-Pressure-State-Impact-Response (DPSIR) framework; (2) social-ecological indicators; and (3) scenario building. Practical application of the approach is demonstrated with the example of European polar and altitudinal treeline areas. The DPSIR framework analyzes causal relationships between the components of the SES. Social-ecological indicators quantify processes in the SES and estimate trends in the DPSIR factors. Combined top-down and bottom-up scenarios envision plausible development paths of the SES in the future based on expected global environmental and social changes which create context specific dynamics between DPSIR factors at specific localities. The proposed approach represents the analytical framework of the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action SENSFOR (Enhancing the resilience capacity of SENSitive mountain FORest ecosystems under environmental change) and can be applied to promote systemic resilience thinking in any SES. KEY WORDS: Human-environment interaction · Ecosystem services · DPSIR framework · Resilience · Social-ecological indicators · Scenarios Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Sarkki S, Ficko A, Wielgolaski FE, Abraham EM and others (2017) Assessing the resilient provision of ecosystem services by social-ecological systems: introduction and theory. Clim Res 73:7-15. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01437 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in CR Vol. 73, No. 1-2. Online publication date: August 21, 2017 Print ISSN: 0936-577X; Online ISSN: 1616-1572 Copyright © 2017 Inter-Research.
Highlights
Achieving a sustainable and balanced human− environment relationship is an important societal challenge
Our approach to resilience analysis is applicable to the understandings of past and future dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in social-ecological systems (SESs) under the impacts of pressures that arise with global change at the sub-national level
We consider resilience as an unquantifiable latent property of the SES, the level of which can only be indicated by the amount of ESs
Summary
Achieving a sustainable and balanced human− environment relationship is an important societal challenge. Biggs et al (2012) identified 3 principles upon which the resilience of SESs to deliver ESs depends, and 4 principles addressing resilience of governance systems for sustainable management of ESs. They identified rigidity/poverty traps, power asymmetries and scientization of policy/politicization of science as main obstacles for human ability to assess the sustainable flows of ESs. The CGIAR approach does not include scenarios in assessing the resilience of SESs in delivering ESs. A further combination of the concepts of resilience and ES has been provided by the OpenNESS EU project (Operationalization of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services: From Concepts to Real-World Applications), in which critical issues that should be solved in marrying the ES and resilience concepts have been identified. Scenarios explore the plausible dynamics and various complex linkages between the components of SESs in the future (Kok et al 2011)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.