Abstract

The relationships between diversity and ecosystem functioning have become a major focus of science. A crucial issue is to estimate functional diversity, as it is intended to impact ecosystem dynamics and stability. However, depending on the ecosystem, it may be challenging or even impossible to directly measure ecological functions and thus functional diversity. Phylogenetic diversity was recently under consideration as a proxy for functional diversity. Phylogenetic diversity is indeed supposed to match functional diversity if functions are conservative traits along evolution. However, in case of adaptive radiation and/or evolutive convergence, a mismatch may appear between species phylogenetic and functional singularities. Using highly threatened taxa, sharks, this study aimed to explore the relationships between phylogenetic and functional diversities and singularities. Different statistical computations were used in order to test both methodological issue (phylogenetic reconstruction) and overall a theoretical questioning: the predictive power of phylogeny for function diversity. Despite these several methodological approaches, a mismatch between phylogeny and function was highlighted. This mismatch revealed that (i) functions are apparently nonconservative in shark species, and (ii) phylogenetic singularity is not a proxy for functional singularity. Functions appeared to be not conservative along the evolution of sharks, raising the conservational challenge to identify and protect both phylogenetic and functional singular species. Facing the current rate of species loss, it is indeed of major importance to target phylogenetically singular species to protect genetic diversity and also functionally singular species in order to maintain particular functions within ecosystem.

Highlights

  • The phylogenetic tree of the 168 shark species under study appeared relatively representative since the mean bootstrap values of nodes was 82% after 100 bootstrapping

  • The different analytical steps resulting from this primary phylogenetic tree were all consistent

  • The comparison of phylogenetic and functional trees topologies converged to an important difference (RTD = 0.970 and branch length score = 0.715)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

UMR LEMAR CNRS/UBO/IRD/Ifremer, IUEM, Rue Dumont d’Urville, Technopôle Brest A total of 168 shark species were common and available between cyt-b and functional traits databases. Cyt-b sequences were aligned using ClustalW (Larkin et al 2007); and the best-fit maximum likelihood substitution model was selected and its parameters values were optimized (Paradis 2011). All these preliminary step to determine the best model and the relevant phylogenetic tree were motivated by the most recent literature, advising the importance of selection the best model of evolution in phylogenetic-ecosystem functioning studies.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call