Abstract

A recently identified dinoflagellate, Pfiesteria piscicida, has been implicated as a cause of fishkills in mid-Atlantic estuaries. To date, field evidence supporting this argument has consisted of samples, analyzed for the presence of the toxic Pfiesteria forms, gathered during a fishkill. I present a probabilistic approach to examine the use of this kind of a posteriori information as an indication of cause and effect relationships. The analysis shows that the conditional probability of the presence of Pfiesteria after a fishkill has begun provides little support for Pfiesteria as a cause of fishkills, without also knowing the probability of Pfiesteria's presence under all conditions. Documenting the relative presence of toxic life stages during fishkills and under non-fishkill conditions will provide supporting evidence to assess Pfiesteria's role in fishkills. However, proving that Pfiesteria causes estuarine fishkills using only ‘after the fact‘ information is essentially impossible.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.