Abstract

Advanced neural interfaces show promise in making prosthetic limbs more biomimetic and ultimately more intuitive and useful for patients. However, approaches to assess these emerging technologies are limited in scope and the insight they provide. When outfitting a prosthesis with a feedback system, such as a peripheral nerve interface, it would be helpful to quantify its physiological correspondence, i.e. how well the prosthesis feedback mimics the perceived feedback in an intact limb. Here we present an approach to quantify this aspect of feedback quality using the crossmodal congruency effect (CCE) task. We show that CCE scores are sensitive to feedback modality, an important characteristic for assessment purposes, but are confounded by the spatial separation between the expected and perceived location of a stimulus. Using data collected from 60 able-bodied participants trained to control a bypass prosthesis, we present a model that results in adjusted-CCE scores that are unaffected by percept misalignment which may result from imprecise neural stimulation. The adjusted-CCE score serves as a proxy for a feedback modality’s physiological correspondence or ‘naturalness’. This quantification approach gives researchers a tool to assess an aspect of emerging augmented feedback systems that is not measurable with current motor assessments.

Highlights

  • Advanced neural interfaces show promise in making prosthetic limbs more biomimetic and more intuitive and useful for patients

  • We first show that congruency effect (CCE) is a useful measure of physiological correspondence, i.e. it is sensitive to changes in feedback modality

  • We demonstrate that the CCE is affected by changes in spatial separation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Advanced neural interfaces show promise in making prosthetic limbs more biomimetic and more intuitive and useful for patients. When outfitting a prosthesis with a feedback system, such as a peripheral nerve interface, it would be helpful to quantify its physiological correspondence, i.e. how well the prosthesis feedback mimics the perceived feedback in an intact limb. The adjusted-CCE score serves as a proxy for a feedback modality’s physiological correspondence or ‘naturalness’ This quantification approach gives researchers a tool to assess an aspect of emerging augmented feedback systems that is not measurable with current motor assessments. Direct neural or cortical stimulation to convey force or other feedback to a user controlling a prosthetic hand may lead to improved systems that better mimic the dynamics of the intact human hand. Emerging prosthetic feedback studies have relied on qualitative subjective user descriptions of feedback quality[4,22]. In this study we have sought to objectively quantify the physiological correspondence, or naturalness, of supplementary sensory feedback modalities

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call