Assessing the quality of mechanically and manually recovered chicken meat

Abstract

The biochemical composition and histological characteristics of meat recovered mechanically by the auger/sieve (a/s) and the hollow drum/belt (hd/b) principles from two different chicken carcass parts were compared with meat recovered manually. The quality of meat recovered mechanically by the hollow drum/belt principle was equal to or higher than the quality of manually recovered meat. The degradation of muscle structure was highest in the meat recovered by the a/s principle and lowest in the manually recovered meat. For the biochemical measurements with the exception of collagen, determinations of a single sample were sufficient to achieve a repeatability of 0.9, whereas for the histological measurements at least 8 samples were necessary. It is suggested that a quality-grading scale based on biochemical composition and level of degradation of muscle fibre structure should be established for all types of minced meat regardless of whether the meat is obtained by mechanical or manual procedures and that legislation concerning the use of MRM should be based on such a scale.