Abstract

Colonialism has devastated the lifeways, more-than-human relations, and collective stewardship practices of Indigenous people. Decolonial restoration may be assisted by collaborative methods like participatory modeling, but further careful evaluation is needed to ensure that these methods that have the potential to connect ways of knowing actually do secure long-term benefit for Indigenous life and land. In this study, we engage in a mixed-methods analysis to assess our participatory modeling of a Zimbabwean agropastoral system. The Muonde Trust, a community-based research organization, partnered with international researchers from outside the community to create an agent-based model (ABM) representing the dynamics of land use in Mazvihwa Communal Area, Zimbabwe. Using interviews and participant observation during modeling workshops, Muonde and their allies assessed the immediate increases in confidence and self-efficacy for members of the research team (during workshops), intermediate-term changes in local land-use policy and management discussions (months to years later), and long-term changes in on-the-ground land use (up to four years later). We find that the model successfully assisted the Muonde Trust in working with local leaders to create policies allowing recultivation of fallow fields rather than further deforesting woodland grazing areas. This success is due to the involvement of the community at key times in the modeling process, resulting in a model that felt accessible and that Muonde (as a key information broker) could use to bring the community together to discuss collective management. Though aspects of our process still relied on colonial tools and power structures, the community in Mazvihwa finds the model useful and feels ownership over it.

Highlights

  • One of the goals of citizen science can be to confront injustice, as in the case of water quality in Flint, Michigan (Gaber 2019)

  • Through our assessment of our participatory modeling process, we identified several key features that underlie our success in doing community-controlled work, making on-the-ground change, and seeing benefit on multiple timescales

  • Muonde’s system knowledge, network, and process are largely responsible for this success, as are the decisions of individual farmers, the willingness of the chiefs and other local leaders to consider new policies, and the desire of residents of Mazvihwa to rebuild collective governance traditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the goals of citizen science can be to confront injustice, as in the case of water quality in Flint, Michigan (Gaber 2019). Colonialism has systematically and intentionally destroyed the lifeways, more-than-human relations, and collective stewardship practices of Indigenous people (Norgaard 2019, Estes 2019). What do citizen science methods have to offer when injustice involves Indigenous people and colonialism? Both the terms “citizen” and “science” are problematic in this context (Eitzel et al 2017), and projects involving Indigenous groups and allied outsider researchers are more commonly labeled community-based participatory research (Wilson et al 2018). To give context for our work, we briefly discuss decolonization, ecocultural restoration, participatory modeling, and the timing of benefits from participatory projects

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call