Abstract

Abstract. This study is the first comprehensive testing of a novel plastic optical fibre turbidity sensor with runoff samples collected in the field and, more specifically, with a total of 158 streamflow samples and 925 overland flow samples from a recently burnt forest area in north-central Portugal, collected mainly during the first year after the wildfire, as well as with 56 overland flow samples from a nearby long-unburnt study site. Sediment concentrations differed less between overland flow and streamflow samples than between study sites and, at one study site, between plots with and without effective erosion mitigation treatments. Maximum concentrations ranged from 0.91 to 8.19 g L−1 for the micro-plot overland flow samples from the six burnt sites, from 1.74 to 8.99 g L−1 for the slope-scale overland flow samples from these same sites, and amounted to 4.55 g L−1 for the streamflow samples. Power functions provided (reasonably) good fits to the – expected – relationships of increasing normalized light loss with increasing sediment concentrations for the different sample types from individual study sites. The corresponding adjusted R2 values ranged from 0.64 to 0.81 in the case of the micro-plot samples from the six burnt sites, from 0.72 to 0.89 in the case of the slope-scale samples from these same sites, and was 0.85 in the case of the streamflow samples. While the overall performance of the sensor was thus rather satisfactory, the results pointed to the need for scale of site-specific calibrations to maximize the reliability of the predictions of sediment concentration by the POF (plastic optical fibre) sensor. This especially applied to the cases in which sediment concentrations were comparatively low, for example following mulching with forest residues.

Highlights

  • Wildfires are widely recognized as a potential driver of conspicuous changes in geo-morphological and hydrological processes, through their direct effects on vegetation, litter layer and topsoil (Shakesby, 2011; Moody et al, 2013)

  • Five of the six study sites within the burnt area – i.e. except site S – were divided in three adjacent strips running from the base to the top of the slope (Machado et al, 2015; Martins et al, 2013)

  • 4.1.1 Within-site differences related to erosion mitigation treatments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildfires are widely recognized as a potential driver of conspicuous changes in geo-morphological and hydrological processes, through their direct effects on vegetation, litter layer and topsoil (Shakesby, 2011; Moody et al, 2013). Important research gaps remain with respect to wildfire impacts on runoff and especially soil erosion, in part due to the relatively limited number of post-fire erosion studies as compared to erosion studies in agricultural areas (Shakesby, 2011). The latter is wellillustrated by the four studies that appear to have been carried out in the Mediterranean Basin on sediment yields from recently burnt catchments (Lavabre and Martin, 1997; Inbar et al, 1998; Mayor et al, 2007; Keizer et al, 2015). They have typically addressed soil losses with a relatively coarse temporal resolution, i.e. multiple runoff events, which is hampering further insight in underlying sediment transport processes

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call