Assessing the outcome of mobility assistive technology (OMAT) in daily living: results in an Italian sample

Abstract

Background Despite the widely recognised benefits of assistive technology (AT) in everyday life, AT abandonment rate due to unmet user needs or expectations is high. World Health Organisation emphasised the importance of evaluating AT outcomes as a top research priority, but comprehensive approaches to assess users’ needs and AT impact are still limited. Aim The research study OMAT (outcomes of mobility assistive technology in rehabilitation pathways) aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a new AT assessment protocol for mobility AT, spanning from an initial evaluation of users’ and relatives’ needs to a follow-up after real-world use of assistive products (APs). Material and Methods An observational single-arm study involving 95 AT users was conducted at Fondazione Don Gnocchi (Milan, Italy). The OMAT protocol encompassed baseline assessment, user training, prescription, authorisation, delivery and follow-up. The evaluations blend standard clinical evaluations with validated AT outcome measures for perceived effectiveness of AT, user satisfaction and changes in quality of life. Results The feasibility of OMAT in clinical settings was established, with 67 user participants completing the protocol. Data showed positive impacts on user satisfaction and perceived AT effectiveness by all participants (users and relatives), with an improvement in the perceived degree of severity in problems. Quality of life outcomes, however, showed mixed results across various domains. Conclusion OMAT is a feasible protocol for assessing mobility APs in clinical settings, underscoring the importance of involving users in the prescription process and the need for comprehensive AT monitoring mechanisms. This approach could enhance AT service delivery, exceeding the current standards of the Italian-National-Health-Service. Implication for rehabilitation Personalise assistive technology (AT) based on user needs for higher effectiveness. Include structured follow-up in rehabilitation for better AT outcomes. Enhance patient involvement in AT selection to improve use. Focus on AT’s role in enhancing overall quality of life. Use validated tools for AT impact assessment and monitoring.