Abstract
The goal of the Europe-wide conservation programme Natura-2000 is to ensure the conservation of both key habitat types and species. Natura-2000 articulates a Europe-wide vision, and the strategic level policy decisions will undoubtedly draw upon regional (national) statistics. At this time neither standardised methods nor funds have been found for essential recurrent small area monitoring. At this time neither standardised method for small area monitoring has been adopted, nor have funds been allocated for such efforts. We use an open raised bog in Austria's Salzburg Province as an example, and advocate a landscape analysis-based monitoring solution which can utilise historical data in combination with modern remotely sensed data sources, geo-visualisation, and landscape metrics analyses. In this paper, we augment a historical range of variability (HRV) assessment made from an aerial photograph time series with additional disturbance state representations created using photo-realistic visualisation. We introduce an object-based approach to historical/scenario landscape analyses and the use of a novel vector-based landscape metric tool. We assess the potential of structural metrics to assist in the quantification of site status by experimenting with several landscape metrics on the historical and simulated representations. The methodology is used to successfully quantify a trend of encroachment by heather and woody vegetation that is consistent with existing literature, and to provide a basis for further analysis. The landscape metrics applied show a marked increase in “bush-encroached bog” via the degradation gradient, as well as a decrease in the remaining core area of undisturbed “open raised bog”. Results of a patch isolation analysis show an increase in both fragmentation and isolation of remaining patches of “open raised bog” area. Landscape metrics are useful for documentation of the structural consequences of changes in the bog, but must be applied with considerable care and rigor in order to indicate habitat conservation status. In our study, generalised landscape metrics evidence various deficiencies in terms of calculation or interpretability, ambiguity in interpretation, detailed species knowledge required for meaningful parameterisation, dependence on thematic resolution, and quality of the underlying classification.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.