Abstract

The distribution and availability of microbes in the environment has an important effect on the composition of the gut microbiome of wild vertebrates. However, our current knowledge of gut-environmental interactions is based principally on data from the host bacterial microbiome, rather than on links that establish how and where hosts acquire their gut mycobiome. This complex interaction needs to be clarified. Here, we explored the relationship between the gut fungal communities of Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana) and the presence of environmental (plant and soil) fungi at two study sites using the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and next generation sequencing. Our findings demonstrate that the gut, plant and soil fungal communities in their natural habitat were distinct. We found that at both study sites, the core abundant taxa and ASVs (Amplicon Sequence Variants) of Tibetan macaques’ gut mycobiome were present in environmental samples (plant, soil or both). However, the majority of these fungi were characterized by a relatively low abundance in the environment. This pattern implies that the ecology of the gut may select for diverse but rare environmental fungi. Moreover, our data indicates that the gut mycobiome of Tibetan macaques was more similar to the mycobiome of their plant diet than that present in the soil. For example, we found three abundant ASVs (Didymella rosea, Cercospora, and Cladosporium) that were present in the gut and on plants, but not in the soil. Our results highlight a relationship between the gut mycobiome of wild primates and environmental fungi, with plants diets possibly contributing more to seeding the macaque’s gut mycobiome than soil fungi.

Highlights

  • The vertebrate gut harbors a complex microbial ecosystem, colonized by a diverse population of microbes that include bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (Falony et al, 2016)

  • 1https://unite.ut.ee/repository.php fungi in the six sample groups (MH_Fecal, MT_Fecal, MH_Plant, MT_Plant, MH_Soil, MT_Soil) were 5.00, 8.69, 35.25, 36.81, 19.88 and 16.24%, respectively

  • The fecal samples were dominated by Aspergillaceae (x = 15.98 ± 16.79%) and Trichocomaceae (x = 13.85 ± 18.18%), plant samples were dominated by Trichocomaceae (x = 15.61 ± 16.87%) and Boletaceae (x = 11.11 ± 11.59%) and soil samples were dominated by Russulaceae (x = 15.34 ± 25.12%) and Aspergillacea (x = 5.51 ± 6.10%)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The vertebrate gut harbors a complex microbial ecosystem, colonized by a diverse population of microbes that include bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (Falony et al, 2016) These populations play a crucial role in host nutrition, immune function, development and health (Flint et al, 2012; Nicholson et al, 2012; Sommer and Bäckhed, 2013; Fung et al, 2017). In humans and nonhuman primates, gut microbiomes are more similar among hosts sharing the same environment than among hosts living in different environments (Moeller et al, 2013; Rothschild et al, 2018; Perofsky et al, 2019) Both the horizontal and vertical transmission of gut microbes among different hosts appear to contribute to this pattern, exposure to microbes from plants consumed, and soil, and water in a host’s local environment represent potentially important microbial seeding sources (Tasnim et al, 2017). Source tracking between sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus), their environment, and their diet revealed that 13% of gut OTUs were derived from surrounding water, whereas 73% were from their prey (Smith et al, 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call