Abstract

Abstract Food defense is the effort to protect food from causing harm to the consumer, including security procedures to mitigate intentional acts of adulteration. To assure entry in new markets, food companies need to develop and implement food defense strategies through third-party certification. Although there are some programs designed to assist food business operators in creating effective food defense strategies, this is still not regarded as a priority by food companies. As a first aim of this work, a first-party audit of two meat-producing industries was performed to verify the implementation of food defense requirements. The second purpose of the work was to compare vulnerabilities identified in those two food industries with the ones detected in other previously certified food units in Portugal. For such, a food defense requirements checklist was prepared for the audit and a private certification database was consulted to compare audit results with those from other food business operators certified by at least one international food defense standard. Audit results revealed that both industries were above 50% in overall compliance regarding food defense requirements; still the main vulnerabilities were related to the lack of a food defense plan, the failure to identify critical areas, ineffective warning systems and no training in food defense. Similar vulnerabilities were detected in other certified national food business operators, leading to the conclusion that implementation of food defense requirements seems to be underestimated. As an intervention strategy proposal, food defense training would be of upmost importance to get staff and managers acquainted with the concept.

Highlights

  • The global food trade is complex and ever-evolving

  • To assess food defense requirements in industrial meat units, a checklist was designed based on the requirements of IFS, BRC and FSSC 22000 (British Retail Consortium, 2015; Foundation Food Safety System Certification 22000, 2019; International Featured Standards, 2014)

  • The selection criteria for the audited food industries included: being a meat-based food producing industry officially approved for food processing and regularly inspected by food authorities and having a food safety management certification system according to standards that included food defense requirements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global food trade is complex and ever-evolving. Due to discrepancies in food law systems of different countries, harmonization of international food safety rules is of upmost importance to reduce trade barriers. The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) set up voluntary food safety management requirements based on internationally-recognized standards (Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation, 2020) Under these standards, food business operators are required to develop and implement food defense strategies to assure market entry through third-party certification of their management systems (Manning, 2019). Food business operators are required to develop and implement food defense strategies to assure market entry through third-party certification of their management systems (Manning, 2019) Certification standards include those benchmarked to GFSI, such as British Retail Consortium (BRC), International Featured Standards (IFS) and Food Safety System Certification (FSSC) 22000 (Global Food Safety Initiative Foundation, 2020; Manning, 2019). These standards include food defense requirements, such as the implementation of a hazard analysis and related risk assessment

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call