Abstract

Ice-influenced hydrologic and hydrodynamic processes often cause floods in cold regions of the globe. These floods are typically associated with ice jams and can have negative socio-economic impacts, while their impacts on riverine ecosystems can be both detrimental and beneficial. Several methods have been proposed for constructing frequency distributions of ice-influenced annual peak stages where historical data are scarce, or for estimating future frequencies under different climate change scenarios. Such methods rely on historical discharge data, which are generally easier to obtain than peak stages. Future discharges can be simulated via hydrological models, driven by climate-model output. Binary sequences of historical flood/no-flood occurrences have been studied using logistic regression on physics-based explanatory variables or exclusively weather-controlled proxies, bypassing the hydrological modelling step in climate change projections. Herein, background material on relevant river ice processes is presented first, followed by descriptions of various proposed methods to quantify flood risk and assess their advantages and disadvantages. Discharge-based methods are more rigorous; however, projections of future flood risk can benefit from improved hydrological simulations of winter and spring discharges. The more convenient proxy-based regressions may not adequately reflect the controlling physics-based variables, while extrapolation of regression results to altered climatic conditions entails further uncertainty.

Highlights

  • River ice processes in general and ice jams, in particular, are actively studied in Asia, Europe, and North America, as can be seen in various publications, such as [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]

  • The objective of this paper is to critically review various methods that can furnish stage-frequency distributions (SFD) for, or flooding potential of, ice-influenced water levels, and thence provide projections of ice jam floods (IJFs) frequency to future years under a changing climate

  • That, at any given river site, such occurrences are controlled by two factors: the discharge magnitude (Q), which is a breakup “driver”; and cumulated degree-days (CDD), which is an index of ice resistance to breakup

Read more

Summary

Introduction

River ice processes in general and ice jams, in particular, are actively studied in Asia, Europe, and North America, as can be seen in various publications, such as [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Ice-related floods are typically associated with the formation or release of ice jams, which often dominate the frequency of extreme water stages and associated flood damages (see, for example, major ice jam occurrences and impacts in Asia, Europe, and North America in [12]). Ice jam floods have negative socio-economic impacts (e.g., mass evacuation, loss of human life, damage to property and infrastructure) while their effects on riverine ecosystems can be both detrimental (e.g., fish mortality, loss of spawning grounds) and beneficial (e.g., replenishment of floodplain ecosystems with river water, sediment, and nutrients). For detailed information on the socio-economic and ecological impacts of ice jams, see, for example [13,14,15,16,17]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call