Abstract

Assessing the impacts of alien plant species is a major task in invasion science and vitally important for supporting invasion-related policies. Since 1993, a range of assessment approaches have been developed to support decisions on the introduction or management of alien species. Here we review the extent to which assessments (27 approaches) appraised the following: (i) different types of environmental impacts, (ii) context dependence of environmental impacts, (iii) prospects for successful management, and (iv) transparency of assessment methods and criteria, underlying values and terminology. While nearly all approaches covered environmental effects, changes in genetic diversity and the incorporation of relevant impact parameters were less likely to be included. Many approaches considered context dependence by incorporating information about the actual or potential range of alien species. However, only a few went further and identified which resources of conservation concern might be affected by specific alien plant species. Only some approaches acknowledged underlying values by distinguishing negative from positive impacts or by considering the conservation value of affected resources. Several approaches directly addressed the feasibility of management, whereas relevant factors such as availability of suitable management methods were rarely considered. Finally, underlying values were rarely disclosed, and definitions of value-laden or controversial terms were often lacking. We conclude that despite important progress in assessing the manifold facets of invasion impacts, opportunities remain for further developing impact assessment approaches. These changes can improve assessment results and their acceptance in invasion-related environmental policies.

Highlights

  • Invasive alien species (IAS) can significantly threaten biodiversity by inducing multiple environmental effects that change community composition, biotic interactions and other ecosystem processes (Vilà et al 2011, Pyšek et al 2012, Ricciardi et al 2013, Gallardo et al 2016, Schirmel et al 2016, David et al 2017, Vilà and Hulme 2017)

  • We conducted a query in the Web of Science (WoS, accessed 11 July 2018, search in all databases) for literature containing the search terms woody OR weed* OR non-native OR invasive OR exotic OR alien OR nonindigenous AND assess* OR evaluat* OR analy* OR predict* OR prioritiz* OR scor* OR classif* OR rank* OR screen* AND risk* OR impact* OR effect* OR hazard* OR consequence* OR invasion* OR invad* OR introduction* OR entry OR threat OR potential* OR tool in its title

  • We provide some quantitative analyses on the major issues covered by this review and use examples to illustrate important points

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Invasive alien species (IAS) can significantly threaten biodiversity by inducing multiple environmental effects that change community composition, biotic interactions and other ecosystem processes (Vilà et al 2011, Pyšek et al 2012, Ricciardi et al 2013, Gallardo et al 2016, Schirmel et al 2016, David et al 2017, Vilà and Hulme 2017). Some alien species may benefit native species (Schlaepfer et al 2011) or underpin ecosystem services (Riley et al 2018). Relevant legislation such as EU Regulation 1143/2014 focusses on IAS, i.e. alien species that threaten or adversely impact biodiversity and related ecosystem services (Tollington et al 2015)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.