Abstract

Multiple stressors are an increasing concern in the management and conservation of ecosystems, and have been identified as a key gap in research. Coral reefs are one example of an ecosystem where management of local stressors may be a way of mitigating or delaying the effects of climate change. Predicting how multiple stressors interact, particularly in a spatially explicit fashion, is a difficult challenge. Here we use a combination of an expert-elicited Bayesian network (BN) and spatial environmental data to examine how hypothetical scenarios of climate change and local management would result in different outcomes for coral reefs on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. Parameterizing our BN using the mean responses from our experts resulted in predictions of limited efficacy of local management in combating the effects of climate change. However, there was considerable variability in expert responses and uncertainty was high. Many reefs within the central GBR appear to be at risk of further decline based on the pessimistic opinions of our expert pool. Further parameterization of the model as more data and knowledge become available could improve predictive power. Our approach serves as a starting point for subsequent work that can fine-tune parameters and explore uncertainties in predictions of responses to management.

Highlights

  • In an ecological context, a stressor has been defined as a perturbation that is either foreign to the system being studied, or natural to that system but influencing it at an excessive level [1]

  • Not as a policy prescription, but as a first step towards better characterizing the complexity and realities of multiple stressors as they pertain to coral reefs

  • The baseline scenario resulted in a mean probability of decline of 59%, climate change with or without management action had a probability of decline of 77%, and the best-case scenario had a mean probability of decline of 58%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A stressor has been defined as a perturbation that is either foreign to the system being studied, or natural to that system but influencing it at an excessive level [1]. Multiple stressors are an increasing concern in the management and conservation of ecosystems because interactions between stressors can potentially exacerbate biodiversity declines [2,3,4,5,6]. Interactions between stressors can result in “ecological surprises” [7], as have been observed in freshwater [3], marine [8], and terrestrial [9] ecosystems. Multiple stressors do not affect ecosystems uniformly, . Instead, they can exhibit spatial heterogeneity (e.g., salt marshes [10], and kelp beds [11]) that can affect the probability of regime shifts at particular sites [12].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call