Abstract

For almost two decades, marine protected areas (MPAs) have been a central instrument of coastal conservation and management policies, but concerns about their abilities to meet conservation goals have grown as the number and sizes of MPAs have dramatically increased. This paper describes how a large (15 year) program of transdisciplinary research was used to successfully measure MPA management effectiveness (ME) - how well an MPA is managed, how well it is protecting values, and how well it is achieving the various goals and objectives for which it was created. This paper addresses the coproduction and uptake of monitoring-based evidence for assessing ME in coastal MPAs by synthesizing the experiences of this program conducted with MPA managers. I present the main outcomes of the program, many were novel, and discuss four ingredients (learned lessons) that underpinned the successful uptake of science during and after the research program: (i) early and inclusive co-design of the project with MPA partners and scientists from all disciplines; (ii) co-construction of common references transcending the boundaries of disciplines, and standardized methodologies and tools; (iii) focus on outcomes that are management-oriented and understandable by end-users; and (iv) ensuring that capacity building and dissemination activities occurred during and persisted beyond the program. Standardized monitoring protocols and data management procedures, a user-friendly interface for indicator analysis, and dashboards of indicators related to biodiversity, uses and governance, were the most valued practical outcomes. Seventy-five students were trained during the projects and most of the monitoring work was conducted with MPA rangers. Such outcomes were made possible by the extended timeline offered by the three successive projects. MPA managers’ and scientists a posteriori perceptions strongly supported the relevance of such collaboration. Local monitoring and assessment meets the needs of MPA managers and forms the basis for large-scale assessments through upscaling. A long-term synergistic transdisciplinary collaboration between coastal MPA managers and research into social-ecological systems (SESs) would simultaneously i) address the lack of long-term resources for coastal monitoring and SES-oriented research; ii) increase science uptake by coastal managers, and iii) benefit assessments at higher levels or at broader geographic scales.

Highlights

  • Global change and local anthropogenic pressures are affecting marine and terrestrial ecosystems worldwide at a pace faster than ever before in human history (Halpern et al, 2008; Ceballos et al, 2017)

  • Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been a central instrument of coastal conservation and management policies for almost two decades, and strengthening MPA coverage, and effectiveness crucial for international agendas [e.g., Aichi Target 11 (Convention for Biological Diversity [Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)], 2014) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 141]. many recent papers have debated or documented the real degree of protection afforded by MPAs (Edgar et al, 2014; Campbell et al, 2018; Strain et al, 2019; etc.), pointing to the risk of “paper parks” that fail to meet their goals (Agardy et al, 2003; Rife et al, 2013)

  • This paper refers to MPA management effectiveness (ME), a notion stemming from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas4, and subsequently used by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global change and local anthropogenic pressures are affecting marine and terrestrial ecosystems worldwide at a pace faster than ever before in human history (Halpern et al, 2008; Ceballos et al, 2017). Coastal ecosystems are vulnerable to global changes through coastline erosion and extreme events, and to the adverse consequences of human activities. Marine protected areas (MPAs) have been a central instrument of coastal conservation and management policies for almost two decades, and strengthening MPA coverage, and effectiveness crucial for international agendas [e.g., Aichi Target 11 (Convention for Biological Diversity [CBD], 2014) and Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 141]. This paper refers to MPA management effectiveness (ME), a notion stemming from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) World Commission on Protected Areas, and subsequently used by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). ME pertains to “how well a protected area is being managed, and primarily the extent to which it is protecting values and achieving the various goals and objectives for which it was created” (Hockings et al, 2006). An indicator-based methodology for MPA ME assessment was produced through an international collaboration of managers and experts under the auspices of the IUCN (Pomeroy et al, 2005)

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call