Abstract

Remote sensing estimates of cover-crop aboveground biomass (AGB) have been used to delineate management zones for smallholder farming in southern Brazil. In this study, we investigated the spatial resolution influence on the AGB estimates of rye, calculated from regression relationships with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and on the subsequent delineation of management zones using the Management Zone Analyst (MZA) software. Data acquired by an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Parrot Sequoia camera (0.20 m spatial resolution) in Brazil were compared with observations from the PlanetScope (PS) satellite constellation (3 m) and the Operational Land Imager (OLI)/Landsat-8 (30 m). A three-endmember mixture model (green vegetation, soil, and shadow) was applied to surface reflectance data of these instruments for evaluating the cover-crop development at two dates in August 2017. Because of the differences in the technical specifications of the sensors, we resampled the UAV dataset into four levels of spatial resolution (1, 3, 10, and 30 m). Using the UAV map (0.20 m) as a reference, we obtained confusion matrices for the original and resampled data. The results showed that the increasing amounts of rye AGB from the beginning to the end of August promoted significant changes in surface reflectance and in soil-green vegetation fractions calculated at variable spatial resolution. The performance of the regression models to estimate cover-crop AGB was approximately similar in the transition from the sub-metric (0.20 m) to the metric (3 m) spatial resolutions, or from the UAV camera to the PS data. For all datasets, the MZA detected two management zones with zone 2 having higher cover-crop AGB than zone 1. When compared to the UAV management zone map (reference), the PS map had a moderate-to-substantial agreement, while the OLI/Landsat-8 map had a fair-to-moderate concordance. Substantial agreements with the reference map were observed at simulated 1 m and 3 m data, as indicated by Kappa coefficients of 0.73 and 0.63 and overall accuracies of 86.40% and 81.40%, respectively. We conclude that the 3 m spatial resolution data of the PS comprise an alternative to delineate management zones for smallholder farming in southern Brazil when compared to the very-high spatial resolution observations of the UAV cameras.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call