Abstract

This paper is concerned with mapping monthly precipitation in Great Britain from sparse point data using a range of interpolation methods. The paper applies techniques that make use of the relation between precipitation and secondary variables, such as elevation, and the concern is to assess if they provide more accurate estimates than methods that do not make use of such secondary variables. The techniques applied were: (i) moving window regression (MWR), (ii) inverse distance weighting (IDW); (iii) ordinary kriging (OK), (iv) simple kriging with a locally varying mean (SKlm) and (v) kriging with an external drift (KED). MWR, SKlm and KED make use of secondary information and in this paper elevation data were acquired to inform estimation of precipitation using these techniques. The relationship between precipitation and elevation locally, and its effect on the accuracy of estimates, was examined for each month of 1999. The performance of each interpolation method was assessed through examination of mapped estimates of precipitation and cross-validation. It was concluded that KED provides the most accurate estimates of precipitation for all months from March to December judging by the cross-validation estimation error summary statistics whereas for January and February OK provided the most accurate estimates.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.