Abstract

This study demonstrates the potential value of seasonal forecasts to smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe—the majority of whom often suffer severely from drought impacts. Using simulation models to compare crop yield performances of farmers with and without forecasts, results indicate that: during a “drought year”, farmers with forecasts (WF) record higher yield gains (28 %) compared to those without forecasts (WOF); during a “neutral year” WF farmers obtain higher yield gains (20 %) than those WOF; however, during a “good year”, results show no yield gains as WOF farmers perform better. This suggests that during a good year, forecasts may not have a significant impact. Using gross margin analysis, results show WF farmers realizing higher returns (US$0.14/ha) during a drought than WOF farmers who net a negative return (−US$0.15/ha).To conclude, El Nino-based seasonal forecasts could play an important role as loss mitigation measures particularly during a drought.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call