Abstract

The Water Framework Directive requires that the ecological status of surface waters be monitored and managed if necessary. A central function in ecological status assessment has the Biological Quality Elements—organisms inhabiting surface waters—by indicating human impact on their habitat. For benthic invertebrates, a wide array of national methods are used, but to date no comprehensive summary of metrics and methods is available. In this study, we summarize the benthic invertebrate community metrics used in national systems to assess the ecological status of rivers, (very) large rivers, and lakes. Currently, benthic invertebrate assemblages are used in 26 national assessment systems for rivers, 13 assessment systems for very large rivers, and 21 assessment systems for lakes in the EU. In the majority of systems, the same metrics and modules are used. In the Red Queen’s race of ecosystem management this may be a disadvantage as these same metrics and module likely depict the same stressors but there is growing evidence that aquatic ecosystems are subject to highly differentiated, complex multiple stressor impacts. Method development should be fostered to identify and rank impacts in multi-stressor environments. DNA-based biomonitoring 2.0 offers to detect stressors with greater accuracy—if new tools are calibrated.

Highlights

  • Protecting the integrity of the biodiversity and functioning of an ecosystem are key factors underpinning the continuous supply of ecosystem services [1]

  • Modules are usually constructed based on taxon-specific indicator values or combinations of metrics that relate to the probability of a particular Biological Quality Elements (BQEs) community succession along a disturbance gradient

  • Based on our initial assessment, we developed a comparative framework in which the different national river ESCATs are grouped according to the number of shared modules and metrics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protecting the integrity of the biodiversity and functioning of an ecosystem are key factors underpinning the continuous supply of ecosystem services [1]. ES reflects the quality of the ecosystem structure and functioning of any surface water and is defined based on the deviation of observed communities of Biological Quality Elements (BQEs) from pristine or near-natural reference conditions. To obtain the relevant parameters of the BQE community, sampling focuses on measures composition, abundance, biomass, or age structure Following this data generation step, specialized software solutions—hereafter called Ecological Status. Modules are usually constructed based on taxon-specific indicator values or combinations of metrics that relate to the probability of a particular BQE community succession along a disturbance gradient. Based on composition and/or abundance of an observed BQE community all indicator values can be summed or averaged, optionally including abundances as weights, to obtain a single numerical descriptor of the sampled habitat. ESCATs and discuss advantages and shortcomings of different modules and metrics for biomonitoring in general and in respect to future biomonitoring approaches

Data Acquisition and Access
Ecological Status Class Assessment across Europe
Types of Approaches
Saprobic Indices
General Degradation Indices
Synopsis of Single Metrics Used as Benthic Invertebrate Community Descriptors
Comparing ESCATs between Countries Based on the Most Frequently Used
Advantages of Different Module and Metric Types
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call